RAW: https://eh.makinico.moe/g/3890744/905a91bbf6/

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

※ Big thanks to Anon for commissioning this translation!

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

★ COMMISSIONS ARE OPEN ★

For information, pricing, and availability, please contact me
via the methods below.

Portfolio: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13BbFWsxkxwVkJK0UDm3qbUdmP1-jQytwQJmoPCAuT7c/edit?usp=sharing

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Contact Methods:

Discord: castlelaa
Email: ccastlle@pm.me
Matrix: @castlela:matrix.org

Shemale, not futanari. Pages 6, 18, and 19 clearly show the vagina is absent, for whatever reason.

Base +8, funne -6, gweh +30, mista TEA +15, Crona1229 +6, supperdude +6

No need to be condescending when saying she's a shemale "for whatever reason", but yes, Botto's dickgirls are always shemales.

Base +6, funne -6, WombatPrime +6, gweh -30, Zoyos +6, Thorgrim_Reaper -6, Kairae -6, supperdude +6, btw153 +6

Are you retarded? I said "for whatever reason" simply because the story doesn't explain how or why it happened. It's uncommon in manga like this for the girl to grow a dick *and* lose her vagina. In fact, it's uncommon enough that you yourself noted it's characteristic of this artist. That's all I meant.

We already have plenty of retards here who either don't understand or actively object to proper tagging. ("f:futanari" is still there as I write this.) Please don't add to the retardation.

Base +8, alehebras -4, Red/Jack -26, thecrix -6, WombatPrime -6, avin艾文 -6, Dein Gott -6, gweh +30, KACTPATOP +6, ShadowDummy69 -10, supperdude +6, Kold -6

The story also doesn't explain how and why she grew a dick in the first place. Why split hairs and highlight the fact she'd lost her vagina as something that should've been explained, then? Your reasoning about this or that being an uncommon characteristic comes from the expectation that both the author are the reader are genre-savvy enough to know that shemales are in the minority in Japanese media, which is a little ridiculous from a genre that's mainstream-adjacent at best, and from an author who's only started publishing works last year.

As a side note, at no point did I dispute the tagging, by the way. I've made that abundantly clear in my previous comment.

Base +6, Kotovsky +6, ShadowDummy69 +10, supperdude +6, 151132 +8, 6996man +7